MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415095336 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf394

Real-world evidence on palmoplantar pustulosis: patient characteristics, diagnostic challenges and predictive factors for treatment survival – a retrospective registry study

2025· article· en· W4415095336 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Thomas Graier, Natalie Bordag, Wolfgang Weger, Nadine Laschober, Gudrun Ratzinger, Constanze Jonak, Knut Prillinger, Robert ­Müllegger, Alexander Mlynek, Bernhard Lange‐Asschenfeldt, Nina Häring, Wolfram Hoetzenecker, Christian Posch, Christina Ellersdorfer, Paul Sator, Barbara Gruber, Angelika Hofer, Alexandra Gruber‐Wackernagel, Franz J. Legat, Katja Großschädl, Viktoria Gruber, Eva Schadelbauer, Maria Repelnig, Paul Gressenberger, Alice Widnig, Katharina Falkensteiner, Wolfgang Salmhofer, Peter Wolf

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCilagUCB PharmaMerck Sharp and DohmeSandoz CanadaUCB Pharma FranceLEO PharmaBoehringer Ingelheim EspañaCelgeneSanofiAmgenPfizerEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsConcomitantUstekinumabComorbidityPsoriatic arthritisPsoriasisRetrospective cohort studyRisk factorDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the clinical characteristics, diagnostic delay and treatment survival in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). OBJECTIVES: To analyse the survival rates of patients with PPP in Austria treated with phototherapy, conventional systemic therapies and biologics. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA). The analysis included data collected between 16 May 1997 and 11 April 2024 from patients with PPP. RESULTS: We included data from 190 patients who underwent 397 treatments. Fifty-four per cent of patients (n = 37/69) were initially misdiagnosed as having eczema with a mean (SD) diagnostic delay of 2.8 (4.8) years. Patients were predominantly women (n = 141/190; 74.2%) and smoked (n = 76/98; 78%). Patients were treated with biologics (n = 198/397; 49.9%), phototherapy (n = 100/397; 25.2%) and conventional systemic therapies (n = 99/397; 24.9%). Median survival time for all treatments was 0.6 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.8], with patients on ustekinumab having the longest median survival time of 2.7 years (95% CI 2.3-upper limit not reached), surpassing all other therapies. This superiority disappeared after interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitors were introduced in Austria. Compared with biologics, conventional systemic treatments [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17; P < 0.001] and phototherapy (HR 4.43; P < 0.001) were associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment discontinuation. In the overall cohort, disease durations of ≥ 2 to < 10 years (HR 0.66; P = 0.05) and ≥ 10 years (HR 0.59; P = 0.004) significantly reduced the risk of treatment discontinuation, while concomitant plaque psoriasis significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (HR 1.43; P = 0.05). In the biologic cohort, concomitant arthritis (HR 2.11; P = 0.002) and the presence of one comorbid disease (HR 2.34; P = 0.03) increased the risk of treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, sex, age at disease onset and smoking did not influence the risk of treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that more than half of patients with PPP experience a diagnostic delay of several years due to an initial misdiagnosis. Patients on ustekinumab (IL-12/23p40 inhibitor) had the longest treatment survival, although its superiority diminished with the introduction of IL-23p19 inhibitors. Finally, shorter disease duration and concomitant plaque psoriasis is a general risk factor for treatment discontinuation, while the presence of a comorbidity and concomitant psoriatic arthritis are risk factors for discontinuing biologics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207