MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415098549 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1646041

FieldNA: a 3D printed vertical microfluidic device for portable nucleic acid isolation from olive oil samples

2025· article· en· W4415098549 on OpenAlexafffund
Vineet Penumarthy, Athanasia‐Maria Dourou, Evangelia Lampropoulou, Stilianos Arhondakis, Ravi Prakash

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNucleic acidNucleic acid methodsMicrofluidicsExtraction (chemistry)DNA extractionSample preparation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolation and purification of nucleic acid is an essential step in molecular assays for several application areas including healthcare, food safety and security, environmental monitoring, forensic science, etc. Nucleic acid extraction is a critical bottleneck towards field deployable nucleic acid-based assays, limiting them to laboratory setups and bench-top configurations. In addition, this lack of portability leads to longer timelines for sample processing and time-to-results, and higher testing costs, limiting access to this highly sensitivity assay tool in many instances. Several efforts have explored the creation of portable nucleic acid extraction systems to complement recent innovations in reducing the footprint and overhead of the nucleic acid test assays; however, most solutions are dependent on supporting systems such as power supply, and peripheral laboratory equipment (centrifuges, incubators). In this work, we present a novel 3D printed and fully disposable device, FieldNA, which minimizes specialized reagents and laboratory equipment requirements for nucleic acid extraction. The device relies on gravity driven vertical flow, and a magnet assisted bead washing and solid-liquid separation phase. Its functionality is demonstrated through DNA extraction from olive oil samples, and its performance is compared to three widely used extraction methods: CTAB combined with phenol chloroform (PCl), and two commercial filter column-based DNA extraction kits. The optimized FieldNA device prototype repeatably produced nucleic acid yield and quality comparable to the above lab-based olive oil DNA extraction techniques. The 3D printed device's performance in isolating olive DNA from different batches of olive oil samples indicates its suitability for handling complex agricultural products, and the viable scalability for implementation in a wide spectrum of applications ranging from food to health sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207