MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415105164 · doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.5c03710

Ring-Opening Reconstruction of Indoles Enabled by C–N Bond Cleavage: Synthesis of Benzo[ <i>c</i> ]pyrazolo[3,4- <i>h</i> ][2,6]naphthyridine Derivatives

2025· article· en· W4415105164 on OpenAlexaff
You Zhou, Li‐Sheng Wang, Zehua Li, Shuang‐Gui Lei, Bo‐Cheng Tang, Ping He, Kai‐Lu Zheng, Yu Lan, An‐Xin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsCentre for Drug Research and Development
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIndole testTandemStereoselectivityMoleculeFluorescenceFunctional groupDensity functional theoryDiene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we report the iodine-mediated tandem process of indole-ring-opening reconstruction, which accomplishes scaffold hopping from indoles to polycyclic heteroaromatics (PHAs), offering the advantages of simple operation and easily accessible substrates. The proposal is compatible with a wide range of active molecules and natural products, affording derivatives endowed with both thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties. Importantly, the reaction mechanism was further investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, confirming that the reaction involves chemoselective formation of a diene and a stereoselective [4 + 2] cycloaddition. The analyses further clarify that a hindering group at the 2-position of the indole is critical for driving the C-N bond ring-opening and recombination process. This work highlights the versatility of the approach as a strategic extension to advancing indole chemistry and skeletal reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic LettersSame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207