MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415113259 · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03491-5

Sensitivity to change of the COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale among Canadian dentists

2025· article· en· W4415113259 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachita Seth, Sreenath Madathil, Walter L. Siqueira, Mary McNally, Carlos Quiñonez, Michael Glogauer, Paul Allison

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Research and COVID-19
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsScale (ratio)AnxietySensitivity (control systems)Anxiety sensitivityPsychometricsMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale (C-19ASS) is valid and reliable instrument to measure COVID-19 related anxiety in Canadian dentists. There is a need to further validate the C-19ASS by evaluating its sensitivity to change over time. To estimate the sensitivity to change over time of the C-19ASS in a sample of Canadian dentists. To estimate the effect of age, sex, practice type and vaccination on the anxiety levels of dentists in Canada. Longitudinal data were used from a prospective cohort study conducted to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 among dentists practising in Canada. Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between total C-19ASS scores and follow-up time in the study and COVID-19 case counts in the province of practice of the participants during the 14 days prior to completing the C-19ASS questionnaire. Mixed effects models were utilized to identify the factors associated with COVID-19 related anxiety. The odds of being in a more severe category of anxiety were reduced by 26% (OR 0.74, 95% C.I. 0.72–0.76) with every 30-day increase in the follow-up time. The odds of being in a more severe category of anxiety increased by 20% (Odds Ratio = 1.20, 95% C.I. = 1.12–1.27) with each 10,000 COVID-19 case increase in the dentists’ work province during the 14 days prior to data collection. Age, sex and practice type were significantly associated with COVID-19 related anxiety in dentists. The C-19ASS is sensitive to change over time and with external anxiety stimuli. COVID-19 related anxiety among dentists was associated with age, sex and practice type. Not applicable. • The COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale (C-19ASS) is sensitive to change over time in a sample of dentists practising during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. • Given the longitudinal validity of the C-19ASS, further documentation of changes in COVID-19 related anxiety ratings among dentists practising in Canada can be done by the concerned authorities. • Younger dentists experienced higher levels of COVID-19 related anxiety. • Female dentists and specialists reported higher levels of COVID-19 related anxiety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychologySame topicDental Research and COVID-19French-language works237,207