Taxifolin for prevention of COGnitive impairment (T-COG trial): a study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background In 2023 and 2024, the novel anti-β-amyloid antibodies lecanemab and donanemab have been approved for treatment of mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia in several countries, including Japan and the United States. Although they successfully eliminate accumulated β-amyloid, they merely delay cognitive deterioration and do not improve cognitive function. This suggests that β-amyloid elimination is insufficient for cognitive improvement. Therefore, novel treatments with pleiotropic neuroprotective effects are warranted. Taxifolin, a bioactive flavonoid, shows pleiotropic effects, such as inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation and oligomerization and hippocampal neuroinflammation, as well as stimulation of brain lymphatic vessel formation in our previous experimental studies. Furthermore, our preliminary observational study showed that oral administration of taxifolin was associated with cognitive improvement in patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial involving 60 patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. All participants will take 100-mg taxifolin or placebo capsules orally once daily for 12 weeks. The washout period will be 6 weeks. The primary objective is to determine the effect of taxifolin on cognitive impairment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The main secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of taxifolin on (i) prevention further cognitive decline, as evaluated by changes in the scores for total Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 14 and trail making test and (ii) changes in white matter hyperintensity volume and number of cerebral microbleeds on brain magnetic resonance imaging. Discussion This T-COG trial may provide valuable insights into new therapeutic approaches, considering that taxifolin has multitarget neuroprotection, which could prevent further cognitive decline, along with its highly safe profile and inexpensive cost. Clinical trial registration https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp , jRCTs051250004.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".