MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415126105 · doi:10.35534/tppc.0709076

Rebuilding the Path of Hope —A Case Study on Anxiety Management and Psychological Support Services for Patients with Neurogenic Bladder

2025· article· en· W4415126105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jing Lü, Rui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and Practice of Psychological Counseling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionAnxietyIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)Mental healthSocial supportDepression (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 72-year-old Chinese-Canadian male developed urination disorders due to neurogenic bladder complicated by lumbar spine surgery. After multiple treatments with poor results, he planned to undergo bladder pacemaker surgery (i.e., sacral nerve stimulation). During this period, coupled with financial pressure and the difficulty of living alone, the patient fell into a state of severe anxiety. Guided by the cognitive-behavioral theory, medical social workers conducted 8 sessions of professional interventions to help the patient reconstruct cognition, strengthen the support network, and enhance self-efficacy. Negative emotions were alleviated by adjusting irrational attribution and carrying out meditation training; the patient was encouraged to strengthen communication with his son living overseas to obtain emotional support; meanwhile, anxiety was relieved throughout the pre-operative period, and mutual assistance resources among patients were connected. In addition, medical social workers collaborated with the medical team to optimize the treatment plan, assisted in dealing with post-operative complications, and improved the patient’s treatment compliance. After the intervention, the total score of the patient’s Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) decreased from 28 to 13, his sleep quality was significantly improved, and he took the initiative to establish a patient support network and re-established the belief of “active coping”. This case highlights the multi-dimensional role of medical social workers in chronic disease management. Through cognitive intervention and resource integration, a path of hope for the patient’s physical and mental recovery has been built.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and Practice of Psychological CounselingSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207