Knowledge & Attitude Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk & Prevention in Patient with Coronary Artery Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death around the world including Pakistan. The patients' knowledge about cardiac risk factors is crucial for the effective management of modifiable risk factors. To assess knowledge and attitude regarding cardiovascular disease risk and prevention in patient with coronary artery disease. It was descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study in nature in which 50 patient diagnosed with coronary artery disease included from the CCU of Institute of Cardiology. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect the data from the participants. Total 50 participants appeared having age range 35 years to 55 years old. Only 44% respondents knew that they suffered from coronary artery disease and remaining 46% didn’t. 14% reported that CAD (Coronary Artery Disease) was the leading cause of death and remaining 86% hadn’t any idea about it. Overall, 64% participants showed low level of knowledge; 20% participants moderate level and only 16% participants showed high level of knowledge regarding CVD risks and prevention. On the other hand, 40% participants showed low level of attitude; 28% moderate and 32% showed high level of attitude regarding CVD. In conclusion, low level of knowledge found among the study participants regarding cardiovascular disease in patients with coronary artery disease whereas attitude was slightly better than knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it