Hubungan Quarter Life Crisis dengan Tingkat Harga Diri pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis (QLC) is a developmental crisis phase in early adulthood characterized by anxiety, confusion about life direction, and social pressures, all of which can contribute to low self-esteem. Students of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Muhammadiyah University of Jember are also not exempt from this phenomenon, which may impact their psychosocial and academic well-being. This study employed a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach to analyze the relationship between QLC and the risk of low self-esteem among these students. The study population comprised all active students totaling 553 individuals, with a sample of 232 respondents selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using the Quarter Life Crisis Scale and Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale questionnaires, and analyzed with the Spearman Rank (Rho) test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The study revealed that most students were in the low QLC category (46%) and had moderate levels of low self-esteem risk (65%). There was a tendency for higher levels of QLC to be associated with higher risks of low self-esteem. The Spearman test showed p = 0.000 (<0.05) with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.523, indicating a significant, strong, and positive relationship between QLC and the risk of low self-esteem. There is a significant relationship between quarter life crisis and the risk of low self-esteem among students of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Muhammadiyah University of Jember. The findings of this study recommend strengthening the role of academic advisors in providing psychosocial support, as well as encouraging active parental involvement through open communication and emotional support to help students cope with Quarter Life Crisis and prevent the risk of low self-esteem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".