Optimization of VE607 to generate analogs with improved neutralization activities against SARS-CoV-2 variants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains a threat to human health, particularly among immunocompromised and elderly individuals, given their heightened vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated morbidity and mortality. Recently, omicron subvariants such as KP.3.1.1 and XEC have emerged with an enhanced ability to evade humoral immunity. The development of new strategies against these variants of concern remains an intense area of research. The small molecule VE607 is an entry inhibitor that targets the Spike glycoprotein and delays virus spread in vivo . To improve the potency of this new class of SARS-CoV-2 entry inhibitors, we generated and characterized VE607 analogs and identified candidates with enhanced activity against variants, including KP.3.1.1 and XEC. Promising analogs exhibited higher inhibitory potency than the original compound and stabilized the receptor-binding domain in its “up” conformation. Among these, DY-III-281 also reduced viral burden and delayed death in SARS-CoV-2-challenged K18-hACE2 transgenic mice. Furthermore, combining DY-III-281 with a non-neutralizing antibody engineered for Fc-enhanced functions exhibited an additive effect in reducing SARS-CoV-2-induced disease burden in mice. Our findings support the continued development of small-molecule entry inhibitors, alone or in combination with antibody-based therapies, as a promising strategy to counteract emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. IMPORTANCE Mutations in the Spike glycoprotein drive viral evolution and confer resistance to current vaccines and some therapeutic interventions against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we report new analogs of the SARS-CoV-2 small-molecule entry inhibitor VE607. These analogs exhibited improved potency against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, including KP.3.1.1 and XEC. One analog, DY-III-281, delayed viral replication in SARS-CoV-2 WA1 -challenged K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, suggesting that small-molecule compounds targeting viral entry might be useful in fighting evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".