MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415135740 · doi:10.1002/mabi.202500281

Injectable Self‐Polymerizing Hydrogel as Bone Filler for Bone Defect Treatment

2025· article· en· W4415135740 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaozhuo Wu, Jianqiu Yang, Shuai Fan, Wenbing Wan, Malcolm Xing

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Bioscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGelatinPolymerizationBone cementNanoparticlePorosityFiller (materials)Radical polymerizationBiocompatible materialMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly(methylemethacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement treats bone defects that have a sol-gel behavior that allows injection application. However, it raises concerns such as leakage, toxicity, infection, and incompatible porous structure. Here, we report an injectable gel catalyzed by silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), allowing highly efficient and biocompatible in situ polymerization to fill up the defects and eliminate infection. This gel consists of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and methacrylated chitosan (ChiMA), providing a similarity to the extracellular matrix for improved cell growth, where mussel-inspired polydopamine (PDA), reduced nano silver can be a catalyst for free radical polymerization due to its high electron activity. We further found the high surface/volume ratio of micro hydroxyapatite (HA) immobilized AgNPs for enhanced catalytic ability. The Ag-PDA-HA in GelMA/ChiMA produces gelation in a tunable time. After two months, the filling gel could completely eliminate S.aureus and raise bone volume fraction to 49.9% in infected skull models, which is approximately 30% more than contrast groups. The gel has not only increased the volume but also induced the maturation of the newly regenerated bone from H&E staining. Overall, this innovative bone filler has fast polymerization, anti-infection, and proven bone regeneration acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular BioscienceSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207