MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415143496 · doi:10.1038/s41567-025-03028-y

Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal

2025· article· en· W4415143496 on OpenAlexafffund
Leo Joon Il Moon, Paul M. Schindler, Emanuel Druga, Johannes Knolle, Roderich Moessner, Hongzheng Zhao, Marin Bukov, Ashok Ajoy

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchOffice of Naval ResearchAzrieli FoundationMax-Planck-GesellschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Nuclear Security AdministrationEuropean CommissionCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsSpinsPolarization (electrochemistry)Aperiodic graphQuantumContinuous symmetryState of matterDiamondSpin (aerodynamics)Local symmetryTranslational symmetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conventional phases of matter can be characterized by the symmetries they break, one example being water ice whose crystalline structure breaks the continuous translation symmetry of space. Recently, breaking of time-translation symmetry was observed in non-equilibrium systems, producing so-called time crystals. Here we investigate different kinds of partial temporal ordering, stabilized by non-periodic yet structured drives, which we call the rondeau order. Using carbon-13 nuclear spins in diamond as a quantum simulator, we use microwave driving fields to create tunable short-time disorder in a system exhibiting long-time stroboscopic order. Our spin control architecture allows us to implement a family of driving fields including periodic, aperiodic and structured random drives. We use a high-throughput read-out scheme to continuously observe the spin polarization and its rondeau order, with controllable lifetimes exceeding 4 s. Using degrees of freedom associated with the short-time temporal disorder of rondeau order, we demonstrate the capacity to encode information in the response of observables. Our work broadens the landscape of observed non-equilibrium temporal order, and raises the prospect for the potential applications of driven quantum matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PhysicsSame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207