MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415156081 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19743-8

Hydrogen solution exposure at a seasonal timescale does not affect the geomechanical properties of clay-rich sandstones

2025· article· en· W4415156081 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Milad Naderloo, Hadi Hajibeygi, Anne Pluymakers

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTechnische Universiteit DelftEnergi Simulation
KeywordsBrineBrittlenessElastic modulusHydrogenModulusAcoustic emissionRepeatability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in underground geological reservoirs is a promising solution for large-scale energy storage. However, several challenges, particularly geomechanical ones, must be resolved before UHS can be widely and safely deployed. The interactions between hydrogen, brine, and reservoir rock, combined with the cyclic stresses resulting from hydrogen injection and withdrawal may affect the mechanical integrity of the reservoir, the caprock, as well as its surrounding formations. This is an experimental investigation into the geomechanical impact of a 6 month exposure of clay-rich sandstone (Yellow Felser) rocks to hydrogen and/or brine. Cm-scale samples were exposed to hydrogen-saturated brine at 150 bar and [Formula: see text] in an autoclave for the period of six months. Afterwards, triaxial cyclic loading experiments were conducted on the samples under confining pressures of 10, 20, and 30 MPa. The results are compared with those from the reference samples, which have been exposed to brine only, for the same time period. Each mechanical test included eight stress cycles in the linear stress regime (below the brittle yield point), followed by loading to failure. The frequency, amplitude, and stress conditions were tailored to each confining pressure. The results showed that six months of hydrogen-saturated brine exposure had no noticeable effect on the failure envelope, elastic properties, inelastic strain, and acoustic properties of the Yellow Felser sandstone compared to exposure to brine alone. Internal friction, P-wave velocity, and Young's modulus each showed a change of around 3%, which is on the same order as the repeatability and therefore indicating minimal geomechanical alteration. Complementary qualitative and quantitative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses revealed negligible microstructural changes. When eight stress cycles were applied within the linear stress regime, the majority of inelastic strain occurred during the first cycle, with no progressive accumulation thereafter. A comparison with samples tested under monotonic loading to failure confirmed that cyclic loading under these conditions does not affect the rock strength of Yellow Felser sandstone. These findings provide new insights into the combined effects of cyclic stress and hydrogen/brine/rock interactions on the geomechanical behavior of clay-rich sandstones under reservoir-relevant pressure and temperature conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→