Depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms among adolescent pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Mwanza Tanzania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Almost one-tenth of all pregnancies and births worldwide are among adolescent women 15-19 years of age, and 90% of these births occur in developing countries. Adolescent mothers face risks related to the transition to adulthood and parenthood, physical changes, and potential health complications associated with early pregnancy and childbirth. These are associated with an increased risk for mental disorders. However, we have very limited information on the prevalence of and factors associated with depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms among pregnant adolescents from low-and-middle-income countries including Tanzania, a gap this study aimed to fill. METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 529 adolescent pregnant women. A convenience sampling strategy was used to recruit participants from preselected antenatal care clinics (ANCs) from June 2023 to March 2024. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to assess depressive symptoms and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale was used to screen for generalized anxiety symptoms. Trained research assistants interviewed participants and administered these questionnaires. RESULTS: The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 20.98%, and 22.5% of the adolescent women displayed symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder. Marital status, living with parents/caretakers, planned pregnancy, partner violence, and pregnancy related stigma were identified as factors associated with both depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: At least one of five adolescent women attending ANCs in Mwanza, Tanzania had symptoms of perinatal depression and/or generalized anxiety disorder. This supports the importance of integrating mental health services into existing antenatal and postnatal care services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".