MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415157014 · doi:10.1007/s11626-025-01113-3

Development and characterisation of a novel cell line derived from coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)

2025· article· en· W4415157014 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mari Austad, Jacob Torgersen, Beate Beatriz Furevik, Lucy E. J. Lee, Guro K. Sandvik

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige UniversitetNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsInfectious pancreatic necrosis virusVirusCell cultureCytopathic effectZebrafishAquacultureTransduction (biophysics)TranscriptomeTransfection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) is an important salmonid species differing from other salmonids in its tolerance and response to pathogens endemic to the aquaculture industry, such as infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) and infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV). Consequently, coho salmon has become a subject of increased scientific interest to investigate the underlying genetic mechanisms behind these and other host-pathogen interactions. Currently, most research studying coho salmon has been conducted using live animal models as there have been few in vitro tools readily available. Here, we present the first cell line from an adult coho salmon, Coho Salmon Fibroblast-Like 1 Norway-Canada (CSFL-1NC) and its preliminary characterisation. CSFL-1NC is a homogenous, spontaneously immortalised cell line from the pectoral fin of a wild adult coho salmon, with a consistent and stable fibroblastic morphology. The cell line has a relatively stable transcriptome across several passages, with high expression of key fibroblastic marker genes, displays rapid migration, and can be genetically manipulated both by transfection and transduction with varying efficiency using plasmids, lentivirus, and/or CRISPR methodology. Virus challenges show clear susceptibility to IPNV as evidenced by cytopathic effects and efficient viral replication, yet it shows little to no response when exposed to ISAV (HPRD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIn Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - AnimalSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207