Exogenous and endogenous antioxidants (ROS) in physiology and pathology of the cardiovascular system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a physiological product of cell activity that is mainly generated by the mitochondria as well as by transmembrane NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5) present at the plasma and nuclear envelope membranes. The level of basal intracellular ROS is regulated by endogenous antioxidants such as glutathione (GSH), and the endogenous and exogenous antioxidant taurine. These two antioxidants are present in all types of cells and more particularly in the heart and the vascular system. They regulate and control intrcellular normal ROS levels in order to prevent an increase that induces dysfunction of the cardiovascular system. There are also exogenous antioxidants that are present in many types of food such as vitamin C, vitamin E, and resveratrol. These exogenous antioxidants are necessary to complement the effect of endogenous antioxidants. However, according to the literature, it is difficult to generalize about the beneficial effect of exogenous antioxidants in preventing cardiovascular disease. This does not necessarily seem to be the case for endogenous antioxidants. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using exogenous and endogenous antioxidants, and suggest the potential application of one of them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".