MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415164259 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.13.679893

Population Genomics of <i>P. miniata</i> along the Pacific Coastline Reveal Subtly Diverging Genomics Along an Extensive Range Gap

2025· preprint· en· W4415164259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Veronica Pagowski, Brendan Cornwell, Erik Hanson, Fiorenza Micheli, Stephen R. Palumbi

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPanmixiaBiological dispersalPopulation genomicsRange (aeronautics)PopulationGenetic structureGenetic divergenceCline (biology)Local adaptation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many marine species exhibit range gaps, patchy distributions, or genetic disjunctions throughout their ranges. These discontinuities can result from various interacting mechanisms, though directly linking ecological and historical factors to observed distributions or genetic disjunctions often proves challenging. Intriguingly, substantial research has demonstrated that these spatial and genetic discontinuities frequently occur in species with long-lived planktonic larvae, which possess the capacity for extensive oceanic dispersal. This study investigates the population genetics of one such species, the bat star Patiria miniata . Despite its long-lived planktonic larval stage of six to ten weeks, P. miniata maintains both a range gap and a, geographically separate, strong genetic disjunction throughout its distribution from Alaska to Baja California. Utilizing low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of over 200 individuals collected throughout P. miniata ’s range between the early 2000s and 2023, we corroborate previous findings of a significant genetic disjunction across Queen Charlotte Sound, north of Vancouver Island. Additionally, we present new evidence of strong divergence at several genomic loci across an extensive range gap in Washington and Oregon, despite subtle genetic population structure at most loci here. Such differences may reflect more recent ecological or oceanographic barriers, rather than historical processes. Our results demonstrate that while marine invertebrate populations may appear panmictic based on genome-wide metrics of population structure alone, strong local selection for specific gene segments may be maintained in some populations. This research contributes to our understanding of the complex interplay between dispersal potential and local adaptation in marine ecosystems and highlights the importance of considering both genetic structure and finer-scale adaptation in coastal marine populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→