Proceedings of the International Workshop on Verification of Scientific Software
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume contains the proceedings of the Verification of Scientific Software (VSS 2025) workshop, held on 4 May 2025 at McMaster University, Canada, as part of ETAPS 2025. VSS brings together researchers in software verification and scientific computing to address challenges in ensuring the correctness and reliability of large-scale scientific codes. The program featured five peer-reviewed papers, three invited contributions, and a set of challenge problems, covering themes such as deductive verification, floating-point error analysis, specification of coupled models, and domain-aware testing. VSS builds on the Correctness Workshop series at Supercomputing and the 2023 NSF/DOE report on scientific software correctness. It serves as yet another snapshot of this important area, showcasing a wide range of perspectives, problems and their solutions in progress, with the challenge problems having the potential to bring together separate verification tools into concerted action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it