MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415172111 · doi:10.2118/227933-ms

Environmental Issues with Orphaned Wells

2025· article· en· W4415172111 on OpenAlexaff
D. Nathan Meehan, Mingyao Liu, Mary Kang, Adam Peltz

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisGroundwaterHazardous wasteGroundwater rechargeGreenhouse gasWater qualityWater supplyEnvironmental remediation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Orphaned oil and gas wells in the United States, abandoned without a responsible party, pose significant and widespread risks to the environment and public health. These wells contribute to methane emissions, groundwater contamination, and chemical migration, yet they received little attention from policymakers until recent decades. Systemic problems, including inadequate funding, insufficient environmental monitoring, and inconsistent regulatory definitions, limit the effectiveness of current risk management and remediation efforts. This study integrates national geospatial data with environmental, infrastructure, and demographic datasets to evaluate proximity-based impacts of more than 117,000 documented orphaned wells. Our analysis shows that more than 4,000 schools, 300 hospitals, and thousands of domestic water wells lie within exposure zones determined using risk-specific buffer distances. For example, we used a 2,000-meter buffer for air quality and buffers from 762 to 3,000 meters for water resources, based on previous studies of air pollution and groundwater migration to provide conservative safety margins. Millions of Americans, with disproportionately high numbers among minorities, older adults, and people with disabilities, live within one mile of an orphaned well. Orphaned wells nearby also threaten environmentally sensitive areas, including national and local parks, major surface water bodies, federally designated critical habitats, and critical infrastructure, for example, power plants and hazardous waste treatment sites. This study also identifies the technical potential to repurpose well sites for geothermal, wind, and solar energy, as well as for subsurface energy storage. It presents new opportunities to address the orphaned well crisis, namely the use of voluntary carbon credit markets to fund plugging activities. Our results offer a comprehensive assessment of both risks and opportunities for remediating orphaned wells with limited funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207