MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415174820 · doi:10.1111/aas.70134

Spread of Injectate After Combined Deep Serratus Anterior and Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Injections: A Cadaver Study to Evaluate Their Utility in Breast Surgery

2025· article· en· W4415174820 on OpenAlexaff
Abhijit Biswas, Vivienne P. Hang, William Newmarch, Kody M. Wolfstadt, Christopher Hansebout, Anne Agur, Timothy D. Wilson, Vishal Uppal

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParasternal lineCadaverBlock (permutation group theory)Intercostal spaceBreast surgeryIntercostal nerves

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Analgesia for breast surgery by a single peripheral nerve block is challenging as breast tissue receives innervation from multiple sources. In this cadaveric study, we evaluated the injectate spread of combined superficial parasternal intercostal plane (PIP) and deep serratus anterior plane (SAP) injections in the tissues relevant for breast surgery analgesia. METHODS: We performed ultrasound-guided dye injections in 18 hemithoraces. 20 mL of methylene blue solution was injected into the superficial PIP at the fourth rib. Following that, 20 mL of black India Ink solution was injected in the SAP at the fourth rib at the midaxillary line. We dissected the specimens, 15 min post-injection to visualize dye dispersion. Staining of the intercostal nerves from each injection was measured by counting the number of intercostal spaces and nerves stained. RESULTS: For PIP injections, the cranial spread of injectate was observed up to the second intercostal nerve involving the anterior cutaneous branch in 14/16 (87.5%) with caudal spread to the fifth intercostal nerve in 15/16 (94%). In addition, the staining of the medial and lateral pectoral nerves was noted in 14/16 (88%) of the specimens. For the SAP dye injections, the cranial spread of injectate was observed up to the lateral cutaneous branch of the third intercostal nerve level in 9/16 (56%) of specimens and caudal spread up to the lateral cutaneous branch of the sixth intercostal nerve in 14/16 (88%) specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated extensive spread of dye injectate with combined PIP and SAP injections involving anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves and lateral and medial pectoral nerves. This study demonstrates an alternative analgesic approach to provide perioperative analgesia for breast surgery. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This cadaver study demonstrates that combining deep serratus anterior block with parasternal intercostal plane block provides reliable injectate spread to the cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. In a clinical setting, this could provide comprehensive analgesia for the breast. Compared with paravertebral blocks, the combination of two fascial plane blocks may offer a technically less challenging alternative with a lower risk of complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207