MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415179197 · doi:10.58931/cdet.2025.3241

Current and Emerging Treatments For the Management of Hypoparathyroidism

2025· article· en· W4415179197 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Khan, Aliya Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Diabetes & Endocrinology Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityTrillium Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoparathyroidismDiscontinuationCinacalcetParathyroid hormoneVitamin D and neurologyEndocrine systemHypercalciuriaAntiandrogensFood and drug administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic hypoparathyroidism is a rare endocrine disorder marked by parathyroid hormone (PTH) deficiency, leading to hypocalcemia and its associated complications. Conventional therapy with oral calcium and active vitamin D fails to address the hormonal deficit and poses risks such as hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. Recent advances in PTH replacement therapy have shifted the treatment paradigm. Palopegteriparatide, a long-acting prodrug of PTH (1–34), is now U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved, demonstrating effective calcium homeostasis, reduced reliance on conventional therapy, and potential renal benefits. Discontinuation of rhPTH (1–84) has accelerated interest in emerging alternatives such as eneboparatide, calcilytics (e.g., encaleret), MBX2109, and oral PTH1 receptor agonists. These novel therapies target PTH signalling through diverse mechanisms—offering injectable and oral options with improved safety, efficacy, and quality-of-life outcomes. This review synthesizes current evidence on approved and investigational treatments, underscoring their mechanisms, clinical impacts, and roles in personalized care for chronic hypoparathyroidism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Diabetes & Endocrinology TodaySame topicThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryFrench-language works237,207