MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415187397 · doi:10.1142/s0219199725500919

Commutative algebras in Grothendieck–Verdier categories, rigidity, and vertex operator algebras

2025· article· en· W4415187397 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Creutzig, Robert McRae, Kenichi Shimizu, Harshit Yadav

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcategoryVertex operator algebraSubalgebraAbelian categoryVertex (graph theory)ConverseRigidity (electromagnetism)Commutative propertyTensor product

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let A be a commutative algebra in a braided monoidal category [Formula: see text]. For example, A could be a vertex operator algebra (VOA) extension of a VOA V in a category [Formula: see text] of V-modules. We first find conditions for the category [Formula: see text] of A-modules in [Formula: see text] and its subcategory [Formula: see text] of local modules to inherit rigidity from [Formula: see text]. Second and more importantly, we prove a converse result, finding conditions under which [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] inherit rigidity from [Formula: see text]. For our first results, we assume that [Formula: see text] is a braided finite tensor category and identify mild conditions under which [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are also rigid. These conditions are based on criteria due to Etingof and Ostrik for A to be an exact algebra in [Formula: see text]. As an application, we show that if A is a simple [Formula: see text]-graded VOA containing a strongly rational vertex operator subalgebra V, then A is also strongly rational, without requiring the dimension of A in the modular tensor category of V-modules to be non-zero. We also identify conditions under which the category of A-modules inherits rigidity from the module category of a [Formula: see text]-cofinite non-rational subalgebra V. For our converse result, we assume that [Formula: see text] is a Grothendieck–Verdier category, which means that [Formula: see text] admits a weaker duality structure than rigidity. We first show that [Formula: see text] is also a Grothendieck–Verdier category. Using this, we then prove that if [Formula: see text] is rigid, then so is [Formula: see text] under conditions that include a mild non-degeneracy assumption on [Formula: see text], as well as assumptions that every simple object of [Formula: see text] is local and that induction [Formula: see text] commutes with duality. These conditions are motivated by free field-like VOA extensions [Formula: see text] where A is often an indecomposable V-module, and thus our result will make it more feasible to prove rigidity for many vertex algebraic braided monoidal categories. In a follow-up work, our results are used to prove rigidity of the category of weight modules for the simple affine VOA of [Formula: see text] at any admissible level, which embeds by Adamović’s inverse quantum Hamiltonian reduction into a rational Virasoro VOA tensored with a half-lattice VOA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Contemporary MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207