MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415192003 · doi:10.3390/geosciences15100400

Evidence of Ejecta from the Late-Triassic Manicouagan Impact in the Blomidon Formation, Fundy Basin, Canada

2025· article· en· W4415192003 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lawrence H. Tanner, Michael J. Clutson, David E. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEjectaSedimentary rockPaleomagnetismPhanerozoicGeologic recordImpact structureSequence (biology)Magnetostratigraphy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Manicouagan impact structure in northeastern Canada is one of the largest, well-documented impact sites among Phanerozoic structures. Once considered a candidate for the cause of end-Triassic extinctions, radioisotopic dating of impact melt rock has established the age of the impact as middle to late Norian. In contrast to the clearly defined association between the Chicxulub structure and the K-Pg boundary, however, the sedimentary record of the Manicouagan impact is unusually sparse, with verified ejecta deposits currently limited to a single deep-marine occurrence (Japan) and one well-documented deposit in a continental (fluvial) setting (England). Sedimentary layers at the top of a widespread seismically deformed zone in a continental sequence in the Upper Triassic (Norian) Blomidon Formation, Fundy Basin, contain sparse, potentially impact-derived grains (shocked quartz and spherulitic grains) that are interpreted as impact ejecta that were reworked within a playa-lacustrine environment. The presence of these ejecta suggests that the seismic deformation resulted indirectly from the Manicouagan impact via reactivation of a nearby fault system. Paleomagnetic correlation of the ejecta-bearing strata in the Blomidon Formation to the Newark astrochronostratigraphic polarity time scale suggests a temporal discrepancy in the correlation of the Newark time scale to the magnetostratigraphic record of the Upper Triassic. This hypothesis is supported by recent correlations of the geomagnetic polarity time scale to the Newark time scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosciencesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207