MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415193589 · doi:10.1017/s1816383125100672

Mitigating the risk of military personnel becoming unaccounted for on the battlefield: An interview with Stephen Fonseca and Vaughn Rossouw on the ICRC’s Military Personnel Identification Project

2025· article· en· W4415193589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of the Red Cross · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeacetimeIdentification (biology)Military personnelHuman resourcesForensic identificationCoronerUnit (ring theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stephen Fonseca has been involved in medicolegal death investigation for over twenty-seven years, with a focus on forensic human identification and on education and professional development in forensic investigations and emergency management. He has co-authored several articles on forensic human identification. As a coroner in Canada, he led the development of a provincial forensic identification system to concurrently address recently reported and historical unsolved identification cases and managed the Identification and Disaster Response Unit (IDRU) in British Columbia for eight years. The IDRU was regionally recognized for the implementation of the multidisciplinary Identification Information Management Model, for which Stephen received the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal. He joined the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in 2013, initially working in the Middle East and thereafter supporting authorities primarily in Africa and globally with the implementation of well-functioning medico-legal systems and improvement of forensic identification in peacetime as well as during and after conflict, disasters and migration. He is currently the Head of the ICRC’s African Centre for Medicolegal Systems, a satellite hub of the Central Tracing Agency’s (CTA) Advisory Red Cross and Red Crescent Missing Persons Centre. Stephen leads the ICRC’s global Military Personnel Identification (MPI) Project, working with State armed forces around the world to develop global guidelines and implement measures to reduce the number of military personnel who become unaccounted for. Vaughn Rossouw is an admitted Advocate of the High Court of South Africa. He holds an LLB and an LLM (cum laude) in public international law from the University of Pretoria, specializing in international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights in military operations. Vaughn joined the ICRC in 2022 as Legal Adviser to the CTA’s African Centre for Medicolegal Systems, advising State authorities and stakeholders in the forensic science services sector on the applicable international and domestic legal frameworks with respect to missing persons and their families, and on the dignified management of the dead in armed conflict and other situations of violence. Vaughn was featured in the Review ’s “Emerging Voices” issue of 2021 and has co-authored publications on transnational investigative approaches to address missing and deceased migrants in Southern Africa together with colleagues at the ICRC Pretoria Regional Delegation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of the Red CrossSame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207