MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415213051 · doi:10.3390/brainsci15101107

Medication vs. Movement in ADHD: Interaction Between Medication and Physical Activity on Neurocognitive Functioning

2025· article· en· W4415213051 on OpenAlexafffund
Beverly-Ann Hoy, Michelle Bi, Matthew Lam, Androu Abdalmalak, Barbara Fenesi

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsNeurocognitiveStroop effectDorsolateral prefrontal cortexDeoxygenated HemoglobinCognitionAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderWorking memoryPrefrontal cortexFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Movement during attention-demanding tasks may help compensate for cortical under-arousal in pediatric ADHD patients. However, the influence of medication during movement is unknown. This study assessed the impact of concurrent movement during executive functioning tasks on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation and inhibitory control, with a particular focus on the influence of medication status. Methods: Twenty-six children with ADHD (15 medicated; 11 unmedicated) and 24 children without ADHD performed a Stroop task under two conditions: while remaining seated (Stationary condition) and while pedalling on a desk cycle (Movement condition). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin levels in the left DLPFC. Results: Sixty-four percent of unmedicated children with ADHD showed greater left DLPFC activity while desk-cycling compared to remaining stationary. Only 37% of medicated children with ADHD showed the same pattern, with 63% showing greater left DLPFC activation when remaining stationary during executive functioning. Children without ADHD had similar DLPFC patterns as unmedicated ADHD children, with 65% showing increased activation during movement. Unmedicated ADHD children who were able to desk-cycle during the Stroop task had higher overall and incongruent accuracy scores; no Stroop differences were found between conditions for children with ADHD who were medicated or for controls. Conclusions: Medicated ADHD children did not benefit from physical activity during tasks requiring executive control, yet unmedicated ADHD children showed significantly greater DLPFC activation and inhibitory control when engaging in movement. If medication is not suitable for children with ADHD due to adverse side effects, movement during executive functioning may help mimic the benefit of medications and similarly support attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain SciencesSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207