MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415216047 · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.012

Optical Coherence Tomography Predictive Biomarkers for Visual Outcomes after Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4415216047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matteo Mario Carlà, Emanuele Crincoli, Fiammetta Catania, Stanislao Rizzo, Aude Couturier

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMackay Medical College
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyRetinalRetrospective cohort studyProspective cohort studyVisual acuityRetinaRetinal detachment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TOPIC: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) features as predictors of visual outcomes following macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To assess the impact of preoperatively assessed OCT parameters including photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, external limiting membrane (ELM) preservation, outer retinal corrugations (ORCs), subretinal fluid (SRF) height, intraretinal cysts (IRC), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through March 2025. Eligible studies evaluated preoperative OCT parameters as predictors of postoperative visual outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird method to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias for individual studies was assessed using a Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The certainty of the body of evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 1841 eyes were included. Lower SRF height was associated with better outcomes (SMD: -0.72, 95% CI: -1.08 to -0.36; I² = 71%). Intact EZ was significantly associated with better visual outcomes (pooled OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.61-5.42; I² = 54%). Preserved ELM integrity was associated with better outcomes (pooled OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 2.13-4.92; I² = 49%). Absence of ORCs was associated with better outcomes (pooled OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.94-4.13; I² = 47%). Absence of IRC and ERM improved outcomes (OR: 2.26 and 2.64 respectively). SRF height predictive value was stronger for detachments ≤7 days. Morphologic staging systems showed strong correlation with visual outcomes (pooled r = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Based on low to very low-quality evidence according to GRADE assessment, preoperative OCT biomarkers may predict visual outcomes after macula-off RRD surgery, with photoreceptor layer integrity showing the strongest associations. However, the high heterogeneity, predominance of retrospective studies, and methodological limitations require that these findings be interpreted with significant caution and validated in high-quality prospective studies before clinical implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207