Towards green transportation: Predictive modeling of intersection congestion using machine learning for sustainable urban traffic management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intersection congestion — primarily caused by frequent vehicle stops — leads to elevated fuel consumption and increased tailpipe emissions (CO, NO 2 , SO 2 , O 3 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 ), with well-documented adverse effects on public health. To enable smarter and more sustainable traffic operations, we propose a machine learning framework for classifying congestion levels at signalized intersections. The study is conducted using the CN+ dataset from Bremen, Germany. The target variable is constructed based on a capacity-driven volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio using 10-minute traffic aggregates. Input features include traffic composition, approach direction, and temporal variables, with optional integration of meteorological and pollution data. To enhance model interpretability and reduce dimensionality, we introduce a novel feature selection method — Dual Importance Intersection Feature Selection (DIFS) — which combines Random Forest (RF) embedded importances with Chi-square statistics. Class imbalance is addressed through fold-internal application of the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique with Edited Nearest Neighbors (SMOTE–ENN). All models are trained within a unified pipeline and evaluated via 5-fold stratified cross-validation (CV). The F1-score is adopted as the primary evaluation metric, while the Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) is used to measure ordinal classification performance. Experimental results demonstrate that gradient-boosted tree models dominate in performance: Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) achieves an F1-score of 0.9937 and QWK of 0.9971, followed by Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) (0.9723/0.9654) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) (0.9652/0.9658). The optimized RF model achieves 0.9270/0.9316, while a compact Artificial Neural Network (ANN) yields lower performance (0.8563/0.8440). Final validation on a strictly unseen 10% hold-out set confirms the generalization ability of CatBoost, achieving an F1-score of 0.9957, QWK of 0.9957, and overall accuracy of 0.9956. These findings suggest that combining capacity-based congestion labeling, robust feature selection via DIFS, and ensemble learning offers a high-performance, deployment-ready solution for real-time, emission-aware urban traffic management systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".