MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415221388 · doi:10.1261/rna.080384.125

CSDE1 regulates the miR-20a-5p/TMBIM6 axis in melanoma

2025· article· en· W4415221388 on OpenAlexaff
Sushmitha Ramakrishna, Yiming Jiang, Tanit Guitart, Fátima Gebauer, Pavan Kumar Kakumani

Bibliographic record

VenueRNA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelanomaGene silencingmicroRNATranslation (biology)Function (biology)Regulation of gene expressionGene expressionMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) play crucial roles in regulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level in tumorigenesis. They primarily target the 3'UTRs of mRNAs to control their translation and stability. However, their coregulatory effects on specific mRNAs in the pathogenesis of particular cancers are yet to be fully explored. CSDE1 is an RBP that promotes melanoma metastasis, and the mechanisms underlying its function in melanoma development are yet to be fully understood. Here, we report that CSDE1 enhances TMBIM6 protein expression without altering its mRNA levels in melanoma cells, indicating post-transcriptional regulation. CSDE1 and AGO2 competitively bind to TMBIM6 mRNA, and we identify that miR-20-5p, which represses TMBIM6 expression, regulates the binding of CSDE1 to TMBIM6 mRNA. Further, the RNA-binding mutant of CSDE1 showed reduced affinity toward TMBIM6 mRNA, thus allowing AGO2-mediated silencing of TMBIM6 expression. Our study highlights the pivotal role of CSDE1 in regulating miR-20a-5p function and the expression of TMBIM6 in melanoma cells, thus unveiling the potential of therapeutic strategies targeting this regulatory pathway in treating malignant skin cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRNASame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207