MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415221461 · doi:10.1051/bsgf/2025019

Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the NNW-NNE trending Libiri doleritic dyke swarm of the Paleoproterozoic Liptako basement (West Niger): Genesis and magmatic evolution

2025· article· en· W4415221461 on OpenAlexafffund
Gambo Ranaou Noura, Lenka BARATOUXb, c, Abdou Latif ABASSE SALEYe, Karimou Dia Hantchi, Abdou Dodo Bohari, Yacouba AHMEDa

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de la Société Géologique de France · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLithosphereMaficGroup (periodic table)AugitePartial meltingEpidoteIgneous rockIgneous differentiationMagmaMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NNW-NNE Libiri doleritic dyke swarm of the Liptako region of West Niger is one of multiple mafic dyke swarms that crosscut the Birimian formations of the Léo-Man shield in the West African Craton. This NNWNNE trending swarm consists of two different groups based on mineralogy and geochemical composition. Both groups have a matching assembly of minerals (ferro-edenite, pyroxene, plagioclase, biotite, apatite, chlorite, grains with granophyric texture and titanomagnetite-ilmenite). In detail Group I dykes have a distinct intergranular texture and some particular minerals (bytownite, pigeonite, clinoenstatite and sanidine) that differ from those in Group II dykes which have a partially preserved ophitic texture and less calcic plagioclases (albite to labradorite). Variation in Mg# and differentiation index (DI) indicate that Group I (Mg# = 55–65, DI = 16.26–20.19) is more primitive in composition than Group II (Mg# = 30–35, DI = 22.82–50.00). REE and other incompatible element values are elevated in Group II compared to Group I, and the REE slopes are parallel one to each other, which suggests that the two groups are co-genetic and that Group II units are more evolved magmas from Group I. The presence of negative Nb and Ta values normalized to primitive mantle in both groups and the La n /Yb n (4.73–6.21) ratios suggests that the magma was formed by partial melting of hydrated garnet lherzolite from the lithospheric mantle, modified by interaction with previously metasomatized lithosphere in subduction setting. Alteration minerals such as ferro-edenite, biotite, epidote and chlorite on augite crystal margins indicate later deuteric alteration or low grade late magmatic metamorphism. Petrography and chemistry of a sample SD (Samira Dyke, a sample from the Libiri pit in the Samira gold mine, which was previously dated at 1791 ± 3 Ma and belong to Group II dykes) suggests the entire swarm of NNW-SSE to NNE-SSW trending dykes belong to the Libiri swarm of a plume-generated Large Igneous Province that extends into formerly adjacent Sarmatia (Baltica) and Amazonia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de la Société Géologique de FranceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207