MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415222248 · doi:10.1093/ijcoms/lyaf010

More than just a voice: how the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results

2025· article· en· W4415222248 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rebecca Barlow-Noone, Elizabeth Deveny, Cajsa Lindberg, Cristina Parsons Perez, Yann Heyer, Dani Mothci, Kent Cadogan Loftsgard

Bibliographic record

VenueIJQHC Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCanadian Patient Safety InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Government (linguistics)Data collectionWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rebecca Barlow-Noone, Elizabeth Deveny, Cajsa Lindberg, Cristina Parsons Perez, Yann Heyer, Dani Mothci, Kent Cadogan Loftsgard; More than just a voice: Ho

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.395
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.474
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3950.474
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0070.013
Scholarly communication0.0350.020
Open science0.0050.016
Research integrity0.0190.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.432
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIJQHC CommunicationsSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207