MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415230340 · doi:10.3390/educsci15101376

Advancing Quality Physical Education: From the Canadian PHE Competencies to the QPE Foundations and Outcomes Frameworks

2025· article· en· W4415230340 on OpenAlexaffabout
Caleb Poulin, Melanie Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumTransformative learningQuality (philosophy)Curriculum developmentPhysical educationHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To foster engaged, resilient, healthy, and active citizens, there is a critical need to elevate the status of quality physical education (QPE) in Canadian schools. Within the K–12 educational context, systemic changes for physical education (PE) daily instructional time, curriculum development, and teacher education are necessary to prepare educators for implementing comprehensive QPE programs that prioritize students’ holistic development and foundational movement competence. This manuscript examines the intricate role of the “Canadian Physical and Health Education Competencies” and its Essential and Foundational Elements, PE Competencies Wheel, and Wholistic Verb Wheel serve as a competency-informed approach for supporting PE curriculum updates and policy reform nationwide. Furthermore, the results section explores how the Canadian PHE Competencies serves as a foundation for advancing QPE and introduces two interconnected frameworks: the QPE Foundations Framework and the QPE Outcomes Framework—Skills for Life. Building on the overarching goals of the Canadian Physical and Health Education Competencies, the QPE Foundations Framework outlines essential components for program implementation, while the QPE Outcomes Framework—Skills for Life identifies eight core skills students develop through quality movement experiences. Together, these frameworks offer a transformative and progressive approach for understanding and assessing QPE, with the intention to serve as practical tools for pre-service and in-service educators, Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) teacher educators, administrators, and policymakers. This manuscript concludes by advocating for enhanced pre-service educator training and ongoing professional development for in-service educators, ensuring all students have access to QPE experiences and equitable opportunities for developing the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to live active and well—for life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0130.022
Scholarly communication0.0170.010
Open science0.0040.014
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.572
Teacher spread0.452 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation SciencesSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207