MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415230357 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2025.1676645

Heavy metal contamination and assessment of radioactivity in coastal sediments: a case study from the El Qulaan area, southern Red Sea, Egypt

2025· article· en· W4415230357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed Abdelaal, Basma A. El‐Badry, Gehad M. Saleh, Ghada A. Khouqeer, Ioan V. Sanislav, El Saeed R. Lasheen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAl-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
KeywordsContaminationEnrichment factorCadmiumHazard quotientHeavy metalsOrganic matterRisk assessmentBarium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the concentrations, spatial distribution, and associated ecological and health risks of nine metals in the sediments of the El Qulaan region along the Red Sea coast in southern Egypt. The levels of barium (Ba), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and vanadium (V) exceeded both the Canadian soil quality guidelines and the Earth’s average shale composition. Nickel concentrations surpassed the Effect Range Median (ERM), while Pb, Cr, and Ni levels exceeded the Probable Effect Level (PEL), suggesting potential adverse effects on local marine organisms. Factor analysis revealed three main factors: the first factor (F1), accounting for 24% of the variance, included Ba, Co, Cr, V, Fe, pH, and total organic matter (TOM%); the second (F2, 20%) comprised Cu, Ni, and Zn; and the third (F3, 19%) included Pb, Gravel%, Sand%, and Mud%. Contamination factor (CF) values indicated varying degrees of pollution: low for Co and Cu, moderate for Pb, Zn, and Fe, considerable for Cr, Ni, and V, and high for Ba. The geo-accumulation index classified all metals as contributing to extreme contamination. The potential ecological risk index (PERI) ranged from 49 to 81, indicating a low ecological risk (PERI <150). Other indices, including the mean effects range-median quotient, toxic risk index, and modified hazard quotient, pointed to moderate toxicity and contamination severity. Non-carcinogenic risk assessments revealed no long-term health concerns, and cancer risk values remained below internationally accepted safety thresholds. Natural radioactivity levels in the sediments were also mapped and analyzed. The mean activities of 232 Th, 226 Ra, and 40 K were 25.43 ± 7.54, 19.99 ± 6.84, and 294.92 ± 77.86 Bq/kg, respectively, all falling below global safety limits. The findings highlight the pressing need for targeted mitigation efforts and policy measures to manage metal contamination in the region’s coastal environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Environmental ScienceSame topicRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207