Integrated Metabolic Complex Genetic Interaction Network of Chromosome 4p Loss in Basal Breast Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Basal breast cancer subtype is enriched for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and exhibits a recurrent large chromosomal deletion in chromosome 4p (chr4p). Chr4p loss is associated with poor survival, evolves early in tumorigenesis and confers on cells a proliferative state. Here, we map the integrated metabolic complex genetic interaction network of chr4p in basal breast cancer to identify targetable vulnerabilities. Differential gene expression analysis of patient derived xenografts and cancer cell models revealed that chr4p loss is associated with changes in cellular energetics and reduction/oxidation balance. Analysis of DepMap pooled genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens identified complex genetic interactions specific to chr4p deletion in basal breast cancer cell models. Functional assays revealed that chr4p loss is associated with disrupted mitochondrial respiratory function and reduced glycolytic capacity, suggesting metabolic rewiring. Increased reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation compromised antioxidant defense mechanisms. Ultimately, this study sheds light on targeted therapies for basal breast cancer harboring large chromosomal deletions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".