MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415241422 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-20102-w

Analysis of the correlation between sleep spindles and cognitive impairment in patients with ischemic stroke

2025· article· en· W4415241422 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yixi Zheng, Tianyu Jing, Liwen Xu, Shutong Sun, Wenyi Yu, Ruonan Liu, Gang Xu, C.‐C. Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYangzhou UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Yangzhou City
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPolysomnographyStroke (engine)CognitionIschemic strokeSleep (system call)Sleep disorderLinear regressionCorrelation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep spindle (SS) are characteristic electroencephalographic hallmarks of nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM), typically defined as oscillatory activity in the sigma frequency range (11-16 Hz) lasting 0.5-3.0 s. Research indicates that SS are involved in memory consolidation, promote memory and learning, and are significantly associated with physiological aging and cognitive decline. To explore the changes in the number, amplitude, and duration of SS in patients with acute ischemic stroke, to analyze the impact of SS on cognitive function in stroke patients, and to understand whether SS can serve as biomarkers for assessing cognitive function in stroke patients. This retrospective study included a total of 314 patients who underwent polysomnography (PSG) at the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University from March 2022 to February 2024 were selected and divided into a stroke group (229 patients) and a control group (85 patients). Baseline data, questionnaire scores, PSG parameters, and SS parameters were collected. Differences between the two groups were compared. Multiple linear regression analyse was conducted to evaluate the influencing factors of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score in patients with ischemic stroke. Compared with the control group, the stroke group had lower MoCA score, fewer SS in nonrapid-eye-movement sleep stage 2 (NREM2) and nonrapid-eye-movement sleep stage 3 (NREM3), lower SS indices, a shorter average duration of SS in N2 sleep, and a lower maximum amplitude of SS in the N3 stage. The multiple linear regression models showed that the MoCA score of stroke patients was significantly correlated with age, sleep efficiency and N2 sleep spindle (N2-SS) index. In stroke patients, there is a reduction in the number, a shorter duration, and a decrease in amplitude of SS. The decrease of spindle activity is one of the potential factors affecting the cognitive level of stroke patients. The change of N2-SS can be related to the degree of cognitive impairment in ischemic stroke patients. SS is expected to be a new objective physiological indicator to evaluate the cognitive function after stroke. However, this study represents an initial exploration of associations rather than causal relationships. Future research should focus on longitudinal designs to clarify whether interventions targeting SS activity could improve cognitive outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→