Daily Household Electricity Consumption in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals With Cognitive Impairment: Prospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Various digital biomarkers have been explored to detect cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older individuals, among which electricity consumption (EC) data obtained from smart meters are novel and promising because they pose no burden to the individuals. Objective: The study aimed to explore the potential of EC as a digital biomarker to screen older individuals with cognitive impairment living alone. Methods: We recruited 40 older individuals living alone and recorded their 1-year daily household EC data. We used the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to categorize participants into 2 groups: those with and without cognitive impairment. As the pattern of daily household EC is different between lower and higher temperature ranges because of the use of heating and cooling equipment, we divided the daily household EC into 3 temperature ranges. Using a linear mixed model, we evaluated the association between daily household EC, daily outside temperature, and the groups. Results: After excluding 12 participants, they were categorized into 2 groups: those with (10/28, 36%) and without cognitive impairment (18/28, 64%). The daily household EC data consisting of 9391 points showed two characteristics: (1) daily household EC was significantly lower in the group with cognitive impairment than in the group without cognitive impairment in the high temperature range (2.158 kWh at 25 °C, P=.02; 3.712 kWh at 30 °C, P<.001). The increase in EC with rising temperature from 25 °C to 30 °C was less in the group with cognitive impairment (2.387 kWh, P<.001) than in the group without cognitive impairment (3.940 kWh, P<.001); and (2) a tendency for lower daily household EC in the group with cognitive impairment was observed in the moderate temperature range (1.795 kWh at 15 °C, P=.06; 1.582 kWh at 20 °C, P=.08). Conclusions: The group with cognitive impairment may use less cooling equipment in the high temperature range and fewer home appliances in the moderate temperature range. Daily household EC might be useful in screening cognitive impairment in older individuals living alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".