Will the Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs Induce the Presence of a Calling?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Career callings manifest when work is viewed as a vital part of one’s identity. Employees who experience a career calling tend to report beneficial outcomes (e.g., career self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and work engagement), but researchers know much less about the factors that shape the presence of a career calling. This study seeks to understand what induces women working in domestic violence services to experience the presence of a career calling. We draw upon basic psychological need theory to hypothesize that the satisfaction of the basic needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness will promote calling presence. Two-wave survey data were collected from 207 women working in domestic violence services. Cross-lagged panel modeling results showed that satisfaction of the basic needs for competence and relatedness (but not autonomy) were positively associated with calling presence. Our findings provide key insights into the utility of basic psychological need theory for understanding the antecedents to the presence of a career calling. Limitations, directions for future research, and implications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it