MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415258664 · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102744

Innovative aptamer approaches in glial tumor diagnostics and therapy: Progress and future directions

2025· review· en· W4415258664 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia A. Luzan, Tatiana N. Zamay, Penghui Zhang, А. А. Народов, Galina S. Zamay, Anna S. Kichkailo, Maxim V. Berezovski, Olga S. Kolovskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationRussian Science Foundation
KeywordsAptamerLiquid biopsyDrug deliveryGlioblastomaTargeted drug deliveryNucleic acidCancerCancer treatment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glial tumors, particularly glioblastomas, remain among the most challenging cancers to diagnose and treat due to their heterogeneity, infiltrative nature, and the protective blood-brain barrier that impedes drug delivery. Aptamers-short, single-stranded nucleic acids selected for high-affinity target binding-have emerged as promising agents in neuro-oncology, offering advantages such as high specificity, low immunogenicity, and superior tissue penetration compared to conventional antibodies. This review outlines recent advancements in aptamer-based technologies for the diagnosis and treatment of glial brain tumors. We describe the use of aptamers in molecular imaging, liquid biopsy platforms, intraoperative tumor visualization, and the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents, including small molecules, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and immunomodulators. The integration of aptamer systems with nanotechnology and AI is accelerating the development of sensitive, non-invasive diagnostic tools and multifunctional theranostic platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Therapy — Nucleic AcidsSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207