Gaussian process with dissolution spline kernel for in vitro dissolution testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In vitro dissolution testing is a critical component in the quality control of manufactured drug products. The f2 statistic is the standard for assessing similarity between two dissolution profiles. However, the f2 statistic has known limitations: it lacks an uncertainty estimate, is a discrete-time metric, and is a biased measure, calculating the differences between profiles at discrete time points. To address these limitations, we propose a Gaussian Process (GP) with a dissolution spline kernel for dissolution profile comparison. The dissolution spline kernel is a new spline kernel using piecewise logistic functions as its feature maps, enabling the GP to capture the expected monotonic increase in dissolution curves. This results in better predictions of dissolution curves. This new GP model reduces bias in the f2 calculation by allowing predictions to be interpolated in time between observed values, and provides uncertainty quantification. We assess the model’s performance through simulations and real datasets, demonstrating its improvement over a previous GP-based model introduced for dissolution testing. We also show that the new model can be adapted to include dissolution-specific covariates. Applying the model to real ibuprofen dissolution data under various conditions, we demonstrate its ability to extrapolate curve shapes across different experimental settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".