O TRABALHO DOCENTE NO CONTEXTO DA POLÍTICA DO NOVO ENSINO MÉDIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considerando o contexto atual de implementação do Novo Ensino Médio, este estudo tem como objetivo discutir aspectos da precarização do trabalho docente relacionando, inclusive, com a reforma do Ensino Médio. Para tal fim procedeu-se uma pesquisa do tipo bibliográfica e documental considerando como categoria de estudo o descritor trabalho docente, tendo como fonte de pesquisa as plataformas da CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Esse tema foi discutido a partir de pesquisas acadêmicas stricto sensu publicadas nos últimos cinco anos; juntamente com a teorização elaborada por autores que analisam a situação educacional do Brasil por uma perspectiva crítica, entre eles Saviane (2013), Ponce (2001), Arroyo (2013) e Laval (2019). As análises evidenciaram que a política do Novo Ensino Médio tem contribuído para o aprofundamento da precarização da profissão docente no Brasil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".