Enhanced replication of a contemporary avian influenza A H9N2 virus in human respiratory organoids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
H9N2 is currently the second most common avian influenza A virus subtype infecting humans. Monitoring viral phenotypic and genotypic adaptation to humans is crucial for risk assessment. Here, we compared the replication of an H9N2 human isolate collected in 2024 (A/HK/2346/2024) to a historical human isolate collected in 1999 (A/HK/1073/1999). In Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, A/HK/2346/2024 and A/HK/1073/1999 replicated to 8 log10 and 5 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU) per ml, respectively. In both human nasal and lung organoids, A/HK/2346/2024 replicated to 6 log10 PFU/ml, but A/HK/1073/1999 failed to replicate in either organoid. The infection rates of both ciliated and non-ciliated cells were higher for A/HK/2346/2024 than A/HK/1073/1999, and the ratios of infected 2,6/2,3 cells were also higher for A/HK/2346/2024. Apart from the mammalian adaptive substitutions that were present in the nasopharyngeal specimen collected on day 1 post-symptom onset (pso) (HA-D183N/D190 T/Q192R/Q226L; NA-del62-64; PB2-A588 V/K702R; PB1-I368 V; PA-K356R/S409N; M1-R95 K), the mammalian adaptive substitution PB2-D253N emerged de novo on day 7 pso. Analysis of all human (n = 96) and avian influenza (n = 14762) H9N2 deposited at GISAID showed the dominance of several human-adaptation substitutions in H9N2 strains collected from humans in recent years. In summary, we demonstrated that a recent H9N2 virus is more adapted to humans, and is able to replicate to high titers in both upper and lower human respiratory tract which may confer higher person-to-person transmissibility and virulence. Our study underscores the importance of human organoid-based phenotypic monitoring and inter/intrahost genotypic monitoring for assessing the zoonotic risk of avian influenza viruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".