MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415274853 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120443

Suicide trends in Germany from 1991-2022, considering misclassification of undetermined intent deaths – a time-series analysis

2025· article· en· W4415274853 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra L. Clement, Edgar Mesquita, Kahar Abdulla, Anne Elsner, Hanna Reich, Andreas Czaplicki, Ulrich Hegerl, Ricardo Gusmão

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakpointSuicide preventionPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsInjury preventionOccupational safety and health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes over time in age-standardised death rates of undetermined intent (USDR) and suicide (SSDR), the sum of suicide and undetermined rates (SUSDR), and the USDR to SSDR rates ratio will point to variations in “hidden suicides” caused by disparities in the death registration procedures. We aim to analyse from 1991 to 2022: 1) trends and differences for suicide (SSDR) and suicide plus undetermined rates (SUSDR), 2) trends and breakpoints in the USDR to SSDR ratio. Suicide and undetermined death registration data for German inhabitants were obtained from the Federal Health Monitoring website from 1991 to 2022. SDRs were calculated and analyzed by joinpoint regression analysis. Rate ratios were calculated by dividing USDR by SSDR. A time-series analysis was then applied to detect structural changes in the USDR-to-SSDR ratio. In the last 32 years, SSDR and USDR declined by 41.01 % and 19.55 %. The trends for SSDR and SUSDR are not identical ( p < 0.001). The ratio of USDR to SSDR varied from 0.11 to 0.37. Breakpoints were identified in 1997, 2010, 2016, and 2005 for males. Analyses are post-hoc, and causal relationships cannot be identified. Unequal trend declines for SSDR and SUSDR could indicate hidden suicide. The breakpoint in 1997 could be due to registry variability when ICD9 gave place to ICD10; the breakpoint in 2010 could be attributed to boosted suicide awareness after national media reporting about Robert Enke's suicide; other factors could explain the breakpoints in 2016, and for males in 2005. • Suicide and undetermined death rates declined in Germany from 1991 to 2022. • Female suicide rates show a real increase starting before the COVID-19 pandemic. • No rise in suicide between 2007 and 2011; data artefacts misled earlier conclusions. • Breakpoints in data trends suggest shifts in suicide misclassification practices. • The ratio of undetermined to official suicides reveals data structure changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207