MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415280107 · doi:10.1002/brb3.70990

Association Between Short‐Term Blood Pressure Variability and the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum

2025· article· en· W4415280107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xinying Zou, Qiwei Ren, Wenyi Li, Shirui Jiang, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Min Zhao, Tianlin Jiang, Huiying Zhang, Fenshuang Zheng, Jun Xu, Jiwei Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiseaseAssociation (psychology)Blood pressureVascular diseaseAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseGenetic association

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Emerging evidence indicates that blood pressure variability (BPV) is a modifiable vascular risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Herein, we aimed to systematically evaluate the potential role of short‐term BPV across the AD continuum. Methods This study included 263 patients on the AD continuum from the Chinese Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle study between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed to obtain blood pressure measurements and evaluate BPV. Partial Spearman's correlation and restricted cubic spline analysis were performed to assess the associations between BPV and neuropsychological tests, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and multimodal neuroimaging measures, respectively. The mediating effects of multimodal neuroimaging measures on the association between BPV and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) were analyzed. Results The elevated standard deviation (SD) and average real variability of nightly diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were correlated with higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores ( r = 0.19, p = 0.034; r = 0.22, p = 0.013). The increased SD of nightly systolic blood pressure (SBP) was correlated with increased Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores and total tau levels ( r = 0.20, p = 0.026; r = 0.17, p = 0.027), and elevated coefficient of variation (CV) of nightly SBP was correlated with higher HAMA scores and lower Aβ 42/40 levels ( r = 0.20, p = 0.026; r = –0.18, p = 0.021). The nightly variability of SBP showed an inverted U‐shaped relationship with Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores ( P for nonlinear = 0.008; P for nonlinear = 0.015; P for nonlinear = 0.021). The left cuneus volume mediated 29.41% of the association between the CV of nightly SBP and HAMA scores, while the right medial orbitofrontal thickness mediated 35.44% of the association between the CV of nightly DBP and NPI scores. Conclusion This study suggests that short‐term BPV may play a role in the AD continuum. These findings provide evidence of a vascular pathway to AD, as well as a potential and accessible intervention target for patients on the AD continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207