MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415281716 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2024.093

Facies-selective porosity in the Silurian (Wenlock) Lockport Group dolostone succession (Elora, Ontario): improving characterization of formation-level porosity

2025· article· en· W4415281716 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jesse Brown, George R. Dix, Beth L. Parker, Colby M. Steelman, Emmanuelle Arnaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCarleton UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaciesDolostoneOutcropShoalEcological successionGroup (periodic table)Sedimentary depositional environmentLithology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study improves porosity conceptualization in the Silurian (Wenlock) dolomitic Lockport Group using core-scale analysis of relationships between depositional facies and the distribution of macroporosity. This dolostone succession forms a crucial regional aquifer, and its shallowly buried to outcropping strata in the study region of Elora (Ontario, Canada) correlate with more deeply buried (> 400 m) petroliferous strata in the flanking Michigan and Appalachian basins. Periods of deposition recorded in the local Lockport Group lithofacies succession were influenced by eustasy and paleo-forebulge movement. Initial deposition established variably thick crinoid–tabulate coral shoals in rising accommodation space over a beveled paleosurface. Thickest shoals (∼ 30 m) are succeeded by tabulate coral mud mounds with stromatactis whereas thin shoals (∼ 15 m) are overlain by argillaceous cherty dolomudstone. Difference in water depth was eliminated through accumulation of subtidal dolomudstone between mounds while stromatoporoid-dominated buildups formed on mound tops. Continued shallowing resulted in regionally extensive fossiliferous peritidal facies. Inter-basin correlation suggests that shallowing in the Lockport succession was coeval with migration of mud mounds into the Michigan Basin and deepening in the Appalachian Basin. In the Lockport succession, about 40% of porosity is fabric-selective, represented by primary (fenestral, intraparticle) and early secondary (moldic) porosity. Fabric-selective porosity favors those facies dominated by tabulate coral, bivalves, and gastropods. An additional ∼ 10% of total porosity is non-fabric-selective (e.g., fractures, vugs, channels) yet exhibits a clear facies influence: solution-enhanced fractures bounding thin crinoid dolorudstone beds and channels developed along some facies boundaries. Remaining porosity is non-fabric-selective and exhibits a more subtle facies influence. This study demonstrates the importance of considering the influence of specific facies on porosity in formation-level hydrogeological analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207