Deciphering conductivity in PEDOT guided by machine learning: From solvent baths to charge paths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PEDOT:Tos is a promising conducting polymer for electronic and bioelectronic applications, yet its charge transport is affected by various factors and remains challenging to optimize. This study investigates the impact of solvent posttreatment on PEDOT:Tos thin films, exploring its influence on morphology and electrical conductivity. A combined experimental-theoretical approach is employed, integrating molecular dynamics, density functional theory, and transport calculations on one hand and conductivity, GIWAXS and XPS measurements on the other hand. Moreover, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework based on convolutional neural networks with the Coulomb matrix as the predictor, and transfer integrals for multiscale transport calculations as targets. Our results reveal that solvent-induced morphological changes strongly affect charge transport, with the ML model effectively reproducing observed conductivity. The developed ML model dramatically boosts the speed of mobility calculations, enabling the analysis of large-scale polymer films that were previously beyond computational reach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".