MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415294827 · doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boaf093

Phylogeographical patterns in the perennial herb <i>Hepatica insularis</i>–<i>asiatica</i> complex: taxonomic insights

2025· article· en· W4415294827 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eun‐Kyeong Han, D. Lím, Amarsanaa GANTSETSEG, Young-Jong Jang, Eun-Do Lee, Ichiro Tamaki, Ji-Eun Choi, Dong Chan Son, Jong‐Soo Park, Jung-Hyun LEE

Bibliographic record

VenueBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biological ResourcesMinistry of Environment - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhylogeographyTaxonLineage (genetic)EndemismSympatric speciationRange (aeronautics)Allopatric speciationBiological dispersalGenetic diversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hepatica insularis, a warm-temperate endemic confined to the southwestern coastal region and Jeju Island of Korea, has long posed a taxonomic challenge in relation to Hepatica asiatica, which is more broadly distributed across cool-temperate regions of northeastern Asia. To address this issue, we investigated their phylogeographical history. Genetic analyses were conducted using eight nuclear microsatellite loci and three non-coding regions of plastid DNA, based on 294 individuals sampled from 13 populations across the Korean Peninsula. Analyses of nuclear markers revealed two distinct genetic clusters concordant with geographical distribution, whereas plastid variation revealed a contrasting signal suggestive of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). Our demographic analyses estimated that H. insularis and H. asiatica diverged approximately 17 200 years ago around the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The current nuclear structure probably reflects historical separation of humid coastal refugia situated along the palaeo-coastlines of the Korean Peninsula and the exposed East China Sea shelf during the LGM. Given the recency of divergence, which has resulted in ILS, we propose that these taxa do not represent distinct species, but instead reflect population-level divergence within a single species. This study sheds light on how rapid evolutionary radiation unfolds in Hepatica species and its implications for their taxonomic interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanical Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207