Generalized Gamma Frailty and Symmetric Normal Random Effects Model for Repeated Time-to-Event Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clustered time-to-event data are quite common in survival analysis and finding a suitable model to account for dispersion as well as censoring is an important issue. In this article, we present a flexible model for repeated, overdispersed time-to-event data with right-censoring. We present here a general model by incorporating generalized gamma and normal random effects in a Weibull distribution to accommodate overdispersion and data hierarchies, respectively. The normal random effect has the property of being symmetrical, which means its probability density function is symmetric around its mean. While the random effects are symmetrically distributed, the resulting frailty model is asymmetric in its survival function because the random effects enter the model multiplicatively via the hazard function, and the exponentiation of a symmetric normal variable leads to lognormal distribution, which is right-skewed. Due to the intractable integrals involved in the likelihood function and its derivatives, the Monte Carlo approach is used to approximate the involved integrals. The maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters in the model are then numerically determined. An extensive simulation study is then conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and the method of inference developed here. Finally, the usefulness of the model is demonstrated by analyzing a data on recurrent asthma attacks in children and a recurrent bladder data set known in the survival analysis literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".