Unsupervised Segmentation of Bolus and Residue in Videofluoroscopy Swallowing Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bolus tracking is a critical component of swallowing analysis, as the speed, course, and integrity of bolus movement from the mouth to the stomach, along with the presence of residue, serve as key indicators of potential abnormalities. Existing machine learning approaches for videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) analysis heavily rely on annotated data and often struggle to detect residue, which is visually subtle and underrepresented. This study proposes an unsupervised architecture to segment both bolus and residue, marking the first successful machine learning-based residue segmentation in swallowing analysis with quantitative evaluation. We introduce an unsupervised convolutional autoencoder that segments bolus and residue without requiring pixel-level annotations. To address the locality bias inherent in convolutional architectures, we incorporate positional encoding into the input representation, enabling the model to capture global spatial context. The proposed model was validated on a diverse set of VFSS images annotated by certified raters. Our method achieves an intersection over union (IoU) of 61% for bolus segmentation-comparable to state-of-the-art supervised methods-and 52% for residue detection. Despite not using pixel-wise labels for training, our model significantly outperforms top-performing supervised baselines in residue detection, as confirmed by statistical testing. These findings suggest that learning from negative space provides a robust and generalizable pathway for detecting clinically significant but sparsely represented features like residue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".