Concomitant Acquired Hemophilia A and Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome from Distinctive Autoantibodies: Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) are rare bleeding disorders that do not often present concurrently. Here, we report a coexisting AHA and AVWS case due to underlying autoantibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF). Case Presentation: A patient with gastrointestinal bleeding and prolonged aPTT was diagnosed with AHA and AVWS. The patient was started on immunosuppression with prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and intravenous immunoglobulin, alongside recombinant porcine FVIII replacement, susoctocog alfa. AVWS reduced the half-life of susoctocog alfa, requiring more frequent dosing and laboratory monitoring until AVWS resolved. The patient had two further relapses; the most recent was treated with Rituximab, following which remission has been maintained. Conclusions: Given the potential therapeutic implications, VWF testing should be considered as part of the diagnostic workup for AHA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".