Concomitant Acquired Hemophilia A and Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome from Distinctive Autoantibodies: Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) are rare bleeding disorders that do not often present concurrently. Here, we report a coexisting AHA and AVWS case due to underlying autoantibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF). Case Presentation: A patient with gastrointestinal bleeding and prolonged aPTT was diagnosed with AHA and AVWS. The patient was started on immunosuppression with prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and intravenous immunoglobulin, alongside recombinant porcine FVIII replacement, susoctocog alfa. AVWS reduced the half-life of susoctocog alfa, requiring more frequent dosing and laboratory monitoring until AVWS resolved. The patient had two further relapses; the most recent was treated with Rituximab, following which remission has been maintained. Conclusions: Given the potential therapeutic implications, VWF testing should be considered as part of the diagnostic workup for AHA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".