MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415304745 · doi:10.1002/micr.70127

Reconstruction of Fingertip or Pulp Defects Using the Free Second Toe Tibial Flap With Plantar Vein

2025· article· en· W4415304745 on OpenAlex
Teng Xie, You Li, Liu Cao, Weiwei Du, Hailiang Liu, Ruixing Hou, Jihui Ju, Linfeng Tang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree flapPulp (tooth)MicrosurgerySecond toeLower limb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: For patients with small-area emergency finger injuries and short venous defects, using the traditional second toe tibial free flap with dorsal toe veins would increase donor site damage and compromise the esthetic outcomes of both hands and feet. This study presents an innovative harvesting technique for the second toe tibial free flap, specifically designed for fingertip or volar pulp defect reconstruction. METHODS: From March 2020 to June 2023, our institution managed 15 cases of finger pulp or fingertip defects using second toe tibial flaps with plantar vein grafts, involving 16 digits. The cohort comprised 10 males and 5 females aged 20-60 years mean 38 years. All patients underwent immediate reconstruction with free second toe tibial flaps. Surgical procedures included: anastomosis of the plantar artery to the digital proper artery, plantar vein to palmar vein, and plantar nerve to digital proper nerve. RESULTS: Postoperative outcomes were assessed using two-point discrimination (2-PD), modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ), and total active joint mobility (TAM). All 16 flaps survived without postoperative complications. The mean follow-up period was 11 months (range 6-18). Quantitative outcomes: Mean 2-PD: 9 mm (range 7-12). Donor site mVSS: 5 (range 4-7). Recipient site mVSS: 5 (range 4-7). MHOQ score: 8 (range 5-11). Thirteen patients reported complete satisfaction with reconstructed digit function and esthetics, while two expressed partial satisfaction. No prominent scarring was observed at foot donor sites. No secondary complications occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The modified free second toe tibial flap technique demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes for digital pulp/tip reconstruction, achieving functional restoration with minimal donor site morbidity. This approach represents a valuable technique for widespread clinical adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it