MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415320789 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2025.10.001

Beyond “One Size Fits All”: Rethinking Methods and Data Reporting to Advance Intersectionality in Cardiovascular Health Research

2025· article· en· W4415320789 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Grubic, Varinder K. Randhawa, Lisa M. Cotie, Tracey J. F. Colella, Laura Banks

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityUniversity Health NetworkToronto Rehabilitation InstitutePublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersectionalityCardiovascular healthData collectionQualitative researchHealth equityPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.823
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.911
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.8230.911
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0140.019
Science and technology studies0.0120.048
Scholarly communication0.0420.072
Open science0.0160.035
Research integrity0.0130.046
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.521
GPT teacher head0.615
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207