MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415351150 · doi:10.15273/pnsis.v54i1.12632

Stand strong for science – support our American colleagues

2025· article· W4415351150 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter G. Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Agency (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL Stand strong for science -support our American colleaguesWe live in very challenging times, environmentally and politically.Climate change is the number one environmental threat that is affecting our lives in Canada annually, with heat waves, wildfires, hurricanes, floods and tornadoes.This general environmental uncertainty also affects us globally.Tragically, due south of us, the world is being turned upside down with the irrational actions undertaken by a highly unpredictable autocrat, US President Donald Trump, who once again occupies the White House.Not only do he and his appointees not believe in anthropogenic climate change, but they are intentionally attempting to ignore, reduce and destroy American science on many fronts.Since January 2025, scientific and medical programs and employment in the US federal government and in the universities have been drastically curtailed, with serious implications for that country and others around the globe.The cutbacks have been enormous and unnecessary (i.e., they are ignorant ideological decisions) and are likely to push American science and society back many years.As a concerned scientist, I have followed the development of this situation closely, especially through coverage in the AAAS journal Science.From January to August 2025, over 100 articles have described the situation 1 .Highlights of the changes and impacts are summarized here, with a commentary on how the NSIS and its membership should respond in this crisis.Given previous decadal US leadership and contributions in science, we are all affected and must respond.As Caplan (2025) and others (e.g.Thorp 2025) have said, "don't wait out four hard years, speak truth to power now, and come together and not be silenced".Above all, speak up for science!The suspensions and cuts to the US federal government employees and programmes to date have decimated the weather forecasting service and climate research programs of NOAA, health research in many federal departments charged with disease control, vaccine development and distribution, advanced medicine, and overseas aid for food and medicine.The department of education is now shut down.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1190.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science→Same topicHealth and Medical Research Impacts→French-language works237,207→